Our Sponsors

Our Friends

 
Home arrow Opinion Archive
Report a comment

Thank you for taking the time to report the following comment to the administrator of this site.
Please complete this short form and click the submit button to process your report.

Name
  
E-mail
  
Reason for reporting comment
  
   

This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots. (see: www.captcha.net)

Type the characters that you see in the box (5 characters). The code can include characters 0..9 and A..Z.

  

I cannot read the characters. Generate a

 

Comment in question

no9 no9 no9 no9 no9 no9 no9

By: virtual (Registered ) on 22-10-2007 05:37

Hows that for arrogance …”IF we decide to give our preferences to” etc, emphasis on the "if" 
Correct me if I’m wrong but the main reason the rodent got in there in the first place (1996) was preferences. Labor achieved 52% of the primary vote. They had the majority ! Between the democrats, the greens (was family first around then? and that idiot from the switch p.pantsdown + the riff raff ….These idiots all managed to get the coalition over the line! The rest is part of a very sorry corrupt history for ten years or 
SO: 
Minor parties must not be allowed to make those decisions for us by refusing to tell us where preferences will go. We need to know this from every candidate well before our compulsory election day out. If this is not evident how can they say we have a democracy? Albeit a capitalist democracy. 
cheers 
viva la revolution unterunder

» Report this comment to administrator

 
»  Go back to the article


mXcomment 1.0.2 © 2007-2009 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved