Our Sponsors

Our Friends

 
Home arrow News Archive
Report a comment

Thank you for taking the time to report the following comment to the administrator of this site.
Please complete this short form and click the submit button to process your report.

Name
  
E-mail
  
Reason for reporting comment
  
   

This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots. (see: www.captcha.net)

Type the characters that you see in the box (5 characters). The code can include characters 0..9 and A..Z.

  

I cannot read the characters. Generate a

 

Comment in question

"liberation"

By: MCDF (Registered ) on 24-10-2007 07:18

Ok so we had to invade Iraq so that China wouldn't invade Iraq... which they were just about to... is that right? And we had to invade Afghanistan to make sure 'we' could sabotage the supply of oil to China and Russia, in case the need ever arose- for example to protect freedom and democracy in the world. 
So if we liberate Iran- by killing half a million or a million or them too- this would be an important step, right? To prevent tyranny? 
And in fact, if 'we' were to liberate Iran, 'we' would have liberated a nice little chunk of the middle east from Afghanistran right down to the border of Saudi Arabia... Wouldn't that be a great act of freedom. For the whole world! I understand where Hitler was coming from now. Imperialism is really a wonderful, liberating thing isn't it.

» Report this comment to administrator

 
»  Go back to the article


mXcomment 1.0.2 © 2007-2009 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved