Subscribe to the YouDecide2007 newsletter






 
Home arrow Opinion Archive
Report a comment

Thank you for taking the time to report the following comment to the administrator of this site.
Please complete this short form and click the submit button to process your report.

Name
 
E-mail
 
Reason for reporting comment
 
   

This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots. (see: www.captcha.net)

Type the characters that you see in the box (5 characters). The code can include characters 0..9 and A..Z.

  

I cannot read the characters. Generate a

 

Comment in question

Suspicion

By: Doug (Registered ) on 26-10-2007 03:01

So you are saying we should ignore an overwhelming majority of scientists who have throughly and rigorously researched global warming and put our trust for the future and the future of the planet in the hands of a right wing think tank funded by big business and corporation who make trillions of dollars from causing CO2 emissions? 
 
In Australia many fine scientists lost their jobs and income just by speaking out about the threat of global warming, what possible incentive could there be for a person to risk unemployment to send out a message? 
 
Yes we are experiencing a peak sunspot activity but this does not explain the sudden rise of global temperatures or the scale and speed of the changes. 
 
No one has addressed my comments of ocean acidification yet either. If there is a good reason to reduce CO2 levels that has to be considered. Is there any other scientific reason the PH level of sea water is changing so dramatically over the last 200 years?

» Report this comment to administrator

 
»  Go back to the article


mXcomment 1.0.2 © 2007-2008 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved