Subscribe to the YouDecide2007 newsletter






 
Home arrow Opinion Archive
Report a comment

Thank you for taking the time to report the following comment to the administrator of this site.
Please complete this short form and click the submit button to process your report.

Name
 
E-mail
 
Reason for reporting comment
 
   

This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots. (see: www.captcha.net)

Type the characters that you see in the box (5 characters). The code can include characters 0..9 and A..Z.

  

I cannot read the characters. Generate a

 

Comment in question

20 Year Plan?

By: AlanK (Registered ) on 28-10-2007 12:33

I would prefer a 20 year plan managed by an independent panel. Fair enough to give some tax breaks to business to entice them to certain areas, but, these tax breaks should be of a limited duration only. Business, for too long, has wanted too much support from the tax payers, government, call it what you wish, to commence an enterprise from the initial stage, and then pocket ALL the profits. 
Look at what happened with GMH. The Australian Government provided the funding for the first 5 years, and when it became profitable, GMH gave back the original investment, and from then on, pocketed [sent to the parent company] the profits. 
What would GMH Aust have done if the enterprise had gone belly up? Not much! 
I am not against a fair reward for a fair investment, but I am against tax payers’ money shoring-up businesses that are badly managed. Today, in my opinion, far too much goes to support business that should be left to stand or fall on its own strengths or weaknesses. I have never seen any government agency step in to support a green grocer who does not buy the fruit or vegies that his customers want, and is left with a lot of waste. 
Over the years lots of Australian inventions have been produced overseas purely because NO Australian business or government or government department has cared to provide some development capital. One example is the ‘Gas Safety Valve’; remember it from ‘The Inventors’? That chap tried for years, and a West German company took it on, sells it here, and the rest of the world, for $50, and a few cents each item royalty is returned to him in Australia, which gives a minimum return to Australia. There must be scores of similar instances about which we know nought. 
 
Of the billions in Superannuation Fund investment portfolios, could not some be farmed out as venture capitol? Some of the returns could be phenomenal. 
 
I am indulging in some kite-flying here, but we do need to start thinking laterally. We have lost the plot over the past 20 years, and I feel that Australia, as a nation needs to have a different perspective, expectation, projection, assumption, presumption, and anticipation of what will be delivered in the future, NOT blindly following what some guru from overseas says is best for us.

» Report this comment to administrator

 
»  Go back to the article


mXcomment 1.0.2 © 2007-2008 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved