Subscribe to the YouDecide2007 newsletter






 
Home arrow Opinion Archive
Report a comment

Thank you for taking the time to report the following comment to the administrator of this site.
Please complete this short form and click the submit button to process your report.

Name
 
E-mail
 
Reason for reporting comment
 
   

This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots. (see: www.captcha.net)

Type the characters that you see in the box (5 characters). The code can include characters 0..9 and A..Z.

  

I cannot read the characters. Generate a

 

Comment in question

Reply from the Nationals in Flynn

By: anne_elk (Registered ) on 21-11-2007 03:58

Today I received a written reply from the Nationals date stamped the 15th of November. 
It is too large to transcribe in this comment section verbatim, so below is my summary. 
 
There are some rather glaring inconsidencies, particularly if a voter is looking for some honest representation. 
 
Mr Churchill supports "clean coal technology" even though this technology does not exist.  
Mr Churchill admits that Nuclear power is not economic, and follows up with stating that there are no proposals to build nuclear power stations in Australia, despite our Government being recommended to do so via their "independent" report conducted by Ziggy whatsizface (who also ensured Telstra was sold).  
"However, if people in the region indicated that nuclear should form part of our future energy supplies..."then I would expect a full and proper community consultation to take place." 
I am glad he would "expect" so, as it hasn't happened yet. 
He goes on to say how such "consultation" would be well informed and balanced by science, environment and personal concerns... la la la la! Hrm... just like the sale of Telstra. 
Then something positive...  
Mr Churchill states that he supports Geothermal energy supplies and that they can make a "huge contribution" to delivering energy supplies without emissions. 
 
With regards to Q8, he answered NO, further adding that "these subsidies are essential for the ongoing operation of private health insurance and schemes." Shame that, our taxes propping up private companies when our taxes should be spent on US.!!!! 
to the tune of $35 BILLION ! 
Mr Churchill goes on to tell me that "Taxes support necessary services and infrastructure and should be spent responsibly and with greater accountability for the outcomes achieved". 
hrmmm rather inconsistent methinx. Where is the accountability for that $35 Billion of my taxes? 
 
Enclosed was a "how to vote" card. 
He has preferenced the Greens LAST, and the ALP second LAST. 
 
Regards 
Anne Goddard 
http:// globalclimatechangeaction.org

» Report this comment to administrator

 
»  Go back to the article


mXcomment 1.0.2 © 2007-2008 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved