Subscribe to the YouDecide2007 newsletter






 
Home arrow Opinion Archive
Report a comment

Thank you for taking the time to report the following comment to the administrator of this site.
Please complete this short form and click the submit button to process your report.

Name
 
E-mail
 
Reason for reporting comment
 
   

This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots. (see: www.captcha.net)

Type the characters that you see in the box (5 characters). The code can include characters 0..9 and A..Z.

  

I cannot read the characters. Generate a

 

Comment in question

Taxes

By: NickStanton (Registered ) on 23-11-2007 04:07

Also the ideal situation would be to pay a bucket load less tax, and be able to utilise private services anyway. But unfortunately what happens then is people waste the money, and then rely on the then underfunded public services anyway. By funding private health insurance what is happening is that tax cuts are being given to be spent on selective areas, so that the system doesn't collapse, it's unfortunate but it seems to be the only way of making it work. Personally i would prefer just far less tax and then let me do everything in the private sector, which by nature and compeditiveness is always gpiong to be better and more efficient. But like I said, that fails when ppl take the health money and go all consumer with it and therefore instead of moving themself to private and taking the strain off the public system, allowing it to work for thse who really need it, they are taking the money from it and still using it. This is the crucial point.

» Report this comment to administrator

 
»  Go back to the article


mXcomment 1.0.2 © 2007-2008 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved