Subscribe to the YouDecide2007 newsletter






 
Home arrow Opinion Archive
Local issues in election 07 - Open opinion thread

Results 21 - 25 of 45

more on roads, transport and fuel

By: willy*bach (Registered ) on 19-10-2007 01:09

Dear AlanK 
 
First, let me apologise to "virtual" for not being "in the building" at his/her beck and call at 12.17 am. I hope you are still on board for this episode of the discussion. 
 
AlanK, I was being selective which of your points to address because there is a word limit. You need to know what I would do if elected to federal parliament. I would apply new thinking that factors in all that has been learnt about transport issues in the past twenty years and the new thinking that treats climate change as our main environmental threat. Both of the major parties are stuck in the old thinking of the 1960s that got us in this mess. 
 
You say, “Only a fraction of the excise is being spent on road/transportation works”. I am not sure what the fraction is, but the amount spent on roads is greater than that spent on public transport, which you also acknowledge. This expenditure needs to increase significantly to make public transport fast, efficient, comfortable and frequent.  
 
It may even make more sense to make public transport free so that the price signal is a stronger one. The Greens have suggested removing the GST from public transport as a first step. Making it free would have to be phased in over time. Studies have shown that the collecting of fares and the time taken to check tickets, give change and count the money at the end of each shift is revenue-neutral. 
 
Developers and land prices have driven our choices about desirable location of our homes. Regrettably planners have been constrained to think that affordability, sustainability are secondary to keeping their jobs in a climate of growth at all costs. Working in the city and living in the outer suburbs are not compatible. Everyone between Kenmore and Milton has to breathe your exhaust emissions and listen to the roar of your engine. Making fuel cheaper or cleaner or replacing petroleum products with ethanol will not significantly change this. There are just too many vehicles, often with one occupant, and people will need to change their expectations to use the public transport system. But public transport will need to be better or I will be joining you with my car in the traffic jam. 
 
If you do some reading on ethanol and the problems of turning food crops into fuel. It is not a win-win situation. The price of food goes up. People are starving in developing countries because of this.

» Report this comment to administrator

 

Two Way

By: Lizzy (Registered ) on 19-10-2007 01:21

I am glad Jason jumped in at this point. 
It was sounding too much like a two way discussion. Maybe the two contributors could send each other their msn or email addresses to continue their discussion in private? 
 
Since I live in NSW I was unaware that this forum was mainly for 'local' issues within Queensland. I did live in Queensland for 17 years, under Joh and under Goss, but if a 'general' opinion is not required them maybe I am connected to the wrong site. 
 
On another point. I am so sad to see in todays polls that Australian's CAN be bought. I thought there may have been some change since the last election. Is it the journalists fault for not expressing opposing views enough, or is it the electorates fault for not being more engaged in the electioneering and the political process?

» Report this comment to administrator

 

Not just QLD

By: jasonw (Registered ) on 19-10-2007 01:33

Lizzie - it's not just for Queensland local issues - that's just the way it seems to have worked out - please feel free to jump in with your own local issues, wherever you live in Australia.

» Report this comment to administrator

 

I want the truth from ALL parties...

By: anne_elk (Registered ) on 19-10-2007 01:54

As such I have been asking questions directly to my reps in my seat (Flynn). They have not yet replied, if and when they do, this site will be the first to know. 
 
I think this site could really benefit from the input from all candidates from all parties. There is nothing a candidate (who wants to be elected by the people) has to fear by joining this site, (unless you are trying to "sell" policies that are against the needs and wishes of the people). 
 
As such I am directly inviting all political parties to join... starting with all email addresses on the Socialist Alliance Site. 
my letter to them sent earlier: 
 
"This is a great site to get your party's words OUT THERE! 
http://www.youdecide2007.org/ 
 
Please spread the word throughout your party. 
Get your candidates on board. 
 
The more awareness this site has the better ! 
 
Good Luck to you all. 
 
Warm regards 
Anne Goddard" 
 
Let's hope some currently elected leaders jump in after i sent their invites ;-)

» Report this comment to administrator

 

2nd letter

By: anne_elk (Registered ) on 19-10-2007 02:22

sent @ Friday, 19 October 2007 12:21 PM to the ALP, CEC and Local ALP Flynn Candidate: 
tellpeter at petergarrett.com.au, Peter.Garrett.MP at aph.gov.au, Julia.Gillard.MP at aph.gov.au, Wayne.Swan.MP at aph.gov.au, janpuk at cecaust.com.au, Chris.Trevor at alp.org.au 
---------- 
This is a great site to get your party's words OUT THERE! 
http://www.youdecide2007.org/ 
 
Please spread the word throughout your party. 
Please get your candidates on board. 
 
Present your parties polices and views in moderated forums DIRECTLY to the voters.  
No advertising costs! 
 
The best to you all. 
 
Regards 
Anne Goddard

» Report this comment to administrator

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next > End >>

Go back to the article



mXcomment 1.0.2 © 2007-2008 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved