Subscribe to the YouDecide2007 newsletter






 
Home arrow Opinion Archive arrow Incompetence and conversation change lead to recovery
Incompetence and conversation change lead to recovery

By Graham Young,


The minor recovery in the government's vote in Newspoll is probably due to a combination of sampling error, APEC and Coalition leadership instability - that doesn't mean that anything significant has changed.

The latest Newspoll has the government recovering by 4%. This could be a result of sampling error. Since July this year Newspoll has given a series of results that have clustered around a two-party preferred vote of 56 Labor, 44 Government. This most recent result of 55 to 44 is therefore well within the sampling error of plus or minus 3%.

Which doesn't mean that it is a product of sampling error. My hunch is that the government's position has improved for two reasons - APEC and leadership speculation. APEC changed the conversation to a subject which favours the government - foreign affairs. Foreign affairs is one of the few areas where the government maintains a lead over the opposition in the public mind. So, while they have generally this year been arguing about issues like health, education, training, climate change and infrastructure which favour Labor, for a change they got the agenda right.

Who knows, Kevin Rudd's polished Mandarin tutorial may have even lost the ALP ground. I suspect most voters understand that there is more to foreign affairs than currying favour with just one, albeit large, country. Howard's battlers were never comfortable with Keating's pitch of Australia as an Asian country, and his toadying to objectionable Asian regimes like Suharto's and Mahathir's.

While leadership speculation showed the government in a poor light, it also confirmed in most people's minds, mine included, that we'd better start getting used to the idea of a Rudd government. Which means that the Rudd government now becomes an issue.

As every state campaign in the last two years has confirmed, it's easiest for a government to win if the opposition is the issue, this would also have had an effect too. The challenge now for the government is to take the swing beyond the margin of error. Peter Costello made a good start at that this morning when he quipped that Kevin Rudd had already had his campaign launch (although the election has yet to be called) and that the way he was going he'd be having his victory party next weekend.

Perhaps the Treasurer has been playing Achilles, and now that the PM has definitely said he'll hand over the mantle of power, he's decided to stop sulking. A few one-liners like that, repeated ad nauseum, could really make a difference in the polls. Even then, I suspect they'll still need a "mean nasty and tricky" Trojan horse strategy if they want to make the citadel of government again.

One thing they definitely need to do is to change the media interpretation of these polls. This poll does not show a significant recovery in the government's vote any way you look at it, and if people think that it does, then attention will start shifting back to the government, which is the last thing Howard wants. Some journalists may think they're doing Howard a favour by boosting his election chances. Labor and Rudd will hope that they continue to think so.


   

Users' Comments  RSS feed comment

Display 5 of 5 comments

How odd

By: Doug (Registered ) on 19-09-2007 13:48

A diplomat Rudd speaking Mandarin a difficult and complex language loses votes. A drunken Rudd in a strip club wins him votes, you have to wonder about democracy sometimes.

» Report this comment to administrator

 

enviro

By: enviro (Registered ) on 20-09-2007 11:01

It matters not weather Mr Rudd can speak Mandarin,its about how he would run the country that's important.Many in WA are interested in how Mr Rudd intends to assist people & country & deal with the existing problems,we've had enough smoke and mirrors.As for polls starting to swing Mr Howards way,I find this hard to believe he should retire & enjoy his family.I believe we've had enough of his policys.

» Report this comment to administrator

 

Johnward1

By: johnward1 (Registered ) on 25-09-2007 02:16

The Howard Government is wondering why it is on the nose, let me tell them why.  
 
It is on the nose because it focuses on monetary motivation, it assumes money is the only motivation for people. 
All of us do many things every day without money being the reason. Money is a not a motivator, it in effect, enables us to; buy food, drink, clothing and shelter. To some extent it satisfies some social and psychological needs. But any pay rise, as most will recognise, is absorbed into our spending within six weeks and so is not a motivation but a help to fund the new sofa, and then we are back to looking for more to meet our needs. 
 
True motivation often comes from inside us. We do things because we enjoy doing it; our work makes us feel good about ourselves. We improve productivity because we want to. 
If individuals perceive the pay arrangements to be controlling in the sense of reducing the extent to which we can determine our actions, the outside control inhibits our intrinsic motivation.  
External intervention increases intrinsic motivation if the person involved perceives it to be supportive, provides recognition and allows them to assume responsibility. In this case, self-este

» Report this comment to administrator

 

Doug

By: Doug (Registered ) on 25-09-2007 12:05

I agree John we need enough money to feed clothe and shelter ourselves everything else is to show off to others. 
 
For to long Australia has ben treated as an economy rather than a society.  
 
We need to learn to look for success and satisfaction in something other than money. I recently had a meeting with a Liberal federal MP who earnestly told me "it is always about money" I felt sad for him. Another Liberal federal MP told me a while back "You must understand, rich people need more money than poor people, because they (the rich ) have more expenses"

» Report this comment to administrator

 

GRAHAM IS TOO YOUNG!

By: WINGCO (Registered ) on 13-11-2007 09:48

Graham did you live during the WAR? WW2 that is! I DID.I was a 10 year old kid in north QLD. IN 1943.The founder of LIBERAL PARTY was Mr.MENZIES.My mother always called him that.My father called him PIG-IRON BOB.THE Japs thought he was a mug. Only 18 year old Aussies stopped them taking AUSTRALIA!NO ONE WHO FOUGHT IN THAT WAR WANTS WAR AGAIN.We are very vulnerable.To speak Mandarin might save us. A BIT OF COMPASSION and Generosity for the rest of our Asian neighbours might too.Easy to find an arguement to start a war!Remember Serajevo?Any insult will do! Why pay for Iron ore?Just take the country!Where's Curtin?We'll need him to get our troops back here!Or someone like him.

» Report this comment to administrator

 

Display 5 of 5 comments



Add your comment
Only registered users can comment an article. Please login or register.


mXcomment 1.0.2 © 2007-2008 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
 
< Prev   Next >