News Archive
The future trap | The future trap |
Environment There are so many things this election should be covering,but most don't believe issues of importance will genuinely change. Industries emissions are increasing due to expansion & lack of emission laws,we still don't have proper monitoring companies do their own.There have been companies caught giving bogus figures, Government have stated each time "we don't have the money or qualified people to do monitoring"they left out or the inclination.This election we are mainly hearing about more corruption,how can JH claim his responsible for our economy?It would have taken off no matter which party was in,the minerals & gas/oil etc where already there.What has he given this country in 11 years?GST,IR laws, war, increased interest rates,a cut to federal input in health so the list goes on.What chance is there of him bringing in genuine laws in regard to Global Warming?I'm fed up with both parties not accepting responsibility their to intent on blaming each other. » Report this comment to administrator environmental policies are lacking It is also interesting that an assessment by the Australian Conservation Foundation rates both the coalition and Labor's environmental policies as 21 out of 100 and 49 out of 100 respectively. If the environment is such a huge concern to so many Australians, why aren't the 2 major parties doing more? Both the Greens and the Democrats managed to score above 90 in the assessment (which you can find at acfonline.org.au). » Report this comment to administrator Consequences Gemma, I think the reason for this is simple - the community as a whole worries about environmental issues, but they don't want to change their lifestyles to deal with them. So political parties talk about the issue, but they do anything real about them, or they wouldn't win elections. » Report this comment to administrator Changing lifestyles Graham, it is simply not true that "the community as a whole worries about environmental issues, but they don't want to change their lifestyles to deal with them". For example, the people of greater Sydney have radically reduced their water consumption since being asked to do so by the NSW Govt in response to the drought. Sydney's water consumption last year was the lowest it's been since the early 1970s, when the population was one million people fewer. What the "community as a whole" wants on environmental issues is clear guidance, and constructive, positive and well-informed leadership, not more trivial appeals to their hip pockets or the politics of divide and rule (the Coalition), tinkering at the economic and technical margins (the Right of the ALP) or doom-laden prophecies of disaster which don't provide policy solutions or a collective way forward (some elements of the environmental movement). The solutions are out there and are being implemented by and in other countries (in Europe and some US States) - we just need to pay more attention to what they're doing learn from them, » Report this comment to administrator Changes for environment. Thank you adamrobertlucas,well put.In Perth it has been the same.Water usage has been cut, as well as many other programs being in place like using solar h/water panels,installing rain water tanks, having cars converted & changing light bulbs.It's a start,although concerns are there re/murcury from bulbs going into land fill.Also a dam in the south that holds as much as all the dams in the metro area, its been over flowing constantly yet government would rather build another desalination plant.We've made a start ,now where waiting to see what government & industry are prepared to do.Don't paint us all with same brush Graham. » Report this comment to administrator Display 5 of 16 comments Add your comment
|
mXcomment 1.0.2 © 2007-2008 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|

