Subscribe to the YouDecide2007 newsletter






 
Home arrow News Archive arrow The future trap
The future trap

By Graham Young,


environment_issue.jpg The most significant finding from our environment survey is that the word "future" means more than you might think.

Today's Australian Newspoll ranks the issues that voters find important . "Water planning" is nominated by 80% and "The environment" by 69%. When we ask about the environment, respondents don't differentiate between these two, which means for the first time ever, environmental issues are likely to be the most important issue in an Australian election.

When asked to nominate what environmental issues are the most important voters say either water or global warming. Labor voters are more likely to be associated with global warming, and Coalition voters with water, but the two are basically the same issue. Coalition and Labor voters just approach it from different doors, which is clear looking at the Leximancer map . While local issues dealing with iconic species, such as old growth forests, sand-mining or species extinctions used to dominate environmental concerns, the Tasmanian pulp mill is the only issue in that category to break-through this election. Drought and climate change are so potentially catastrophic that they muscle the other issues out of the way.

As with previous surveys on the issue, the economy becomes a dependent of global warming and water, suggesting that the government’s tax pitch will fail to convert votes because voters believe lack of action on the environment has put the economy at risk, so they see little point in arguing about souping it up a little.

Careful semantic analysis of responses reveals another problem for the government. Labor is framing this election as a choice between the past and the future, and the Coalition cannot avoid this frame. It needs to prove that it has plans for the future. So while it will run on its record, it must also run on the future Yet that word "future" is closely associated with these environmental concerns, meaning that any use of future is likely to reinforce concerns about the dominate future issue – the environment.

Not that the environment is an outright win for Labor. While clear majorities of the major parties think that their party is the best to handle the issue, less than 50% of Labor voters say that Labor is best. In fact, almost the same number of Labor voters (46%) nominate the Greens as the best, as nominate Labor as the best (48%). This gives the Coalition some room to maneuver, although it suggests that the more the future and the environment is mentioned, the higher the Greens vote will go in the Senate.

The figures also hide a backlash against the concentration on global warming and drought. A large proportion of Coalition voters who nominate the environment as important do so because, to quote one, "Rudd and the Laqbor (sic) Party have become consumed with global warming fundamentalism. They can't be trusted to be sensible."

To read more detailed analysis click here to download the report . You can also do you own semantic analysis on the issues using Leximancer by clicking on this link.


   

Users' Comments  RSS feed comment

Display 5 of 16 comments

Environment

By: enviro (Registered ) on 17-10-2007 04:13

There are so many things this election should be covering,but most don't believe issues of importance will genuinely change. Industries emissions are increasing due to expansion & lack of emission laws,we still don't have proper monitoring companies do their own.There have been companies caught giving bogus figures, Government have stated each time "we don't have the money or qualified people to do monitoring"they left out or the inclination.This election we are mainly hearing about more corruption,how can JH claim his responsible for our economy?It would have taken off no matter which party was in,the minerals & gas/oil etc where already there.What has he given this country in 11 years?GST,IR laws, war, increased interest rates,a cut to federal input in health so the list goes on.What chance is there of him bringing in genuine laws in regard to Global Warming?I'm fed up with both parties not accepting responsibility their to intent on blaming each other.

» Report this comment to administrator

 

environmental policies are lacking

By: Gemma (Registered ) on 17-10-2007 04:51

It is also interesting that an assessment by the Australian Conservation Foundation rates both the coalition and Labor's environmental policies as 21 out of 100 and 49 out of 100 respectively. If the environment is such a huge concern to so many Australians, why aren't the 2 major parties doing more? Both the Greens and the Democrats managed to score above 90 in the assessment (which you can find at acfonline.org.au).

» Report this comment to administrator

 

Consequences

By: Graham Young (Registered ) on 17-10-2007 05:09

Gemma, I think the reason for this is simple - the community as a whole worries about environmental issues, but they don't want to change their lifestyles to deal with them. So political parties talk about the issue, but they do anything real about them, or they wouldn't win elections.

» Report this comment to administrator

 

Changing lifestyles

By: adamrobertlucas (Registered ) on 17-10-2007 06:36

Graham, it is simply not true that "the community as a whole worries about environmental issues, but they don't want to change their lifestyles to deal with them". For example, the people of greater Sydney have radically reduced their water consumption since being asked to do so by the NSW Govt in response to the drought. Sydney's water consumption last year was the lowest it's been since the early 1970s, when the population was one million people fewer. What the "community as a whole" wants on environmental issues is clear guidance, and constructive, positive and well-informed leadership, not more trivial appeals to their hip pockets or the politics of divide and rule (the Coalition), tinkering at the economic and technical margins (the Right of the ALP) or doom-laden prophecies of disaster which don't provide policy solutions or a collective way forward (some elements of the environmental movement). The solutions are out there and are being implemented by and in other countries (in Europe and some US States) - we just need to pay more attention to what they're doing learn from them,

» Report this comment to administrator

 

Changes for environment.

By: enviro (Registered ) on 17-10-2007 06:59

Thank you adamrobertlucas,well put.In Perth it has been the same.Water usage has been cut, as well as many other programs being in place like using solar h/water panels,installing rain water tanks, having cars converted & changing light bulbs.It's a start,although concerns are there re/murcury from bulbs going into land fill.Also a dam in the south that holds as much as all the dams in the metro area, its been over flowing constantly yet government would rather build another desalination plant.We've made a start ,now where waiting to see what government & industry are prepared to do.Don't paint us all with same brush Graham.

» Report this comment to administrator

 

Display 5 of 16 comments



Add your comment
Only registered users can comment an article. Please login or register.

More comments...



mXcomment 1.0.2 © 2007-2008 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
 
< Prev   Next >