Where are our representatives from the Labor Party, Liberal
Party and the National Party? Invites to join this open forum have been sent. They
ignore me.
Whether climate change is real, a bunch of hot wind from
some kooky scientists or a political ploy of Al Gore’s, Australia’s
economy would greatly benefit from energy solutions which remain, under their
noses, but ignored in their future plans.
Solar and wind in combination are viable energy solutions
when used in small situations eg. households. They could also be highly
financially viable and attractive to individual households when such energy
production is fed back into the grid at the same price value as energy taken
out of the grid. Currently there is a great discrepancy in the value of
"feed in" and "take out" energy. Of course, heavily
balanced towards the financial advantage of external existing energy suppliers,
i.e. (mainly) the coal industry.
Tidal and wave power are alternatives that do a lot less
damage in the long term for communities on the coast in comparison to nuclear
which results in millions of years of deadly poison. Which "desert"
communities will this deadly legacy be forced upon? Will the political powers
that be under such a system of energy supply be held accountable for accidents
which occur over such mind boggling lengths of time? With this in mind (and the
history of accidents in nuclear industry to date) can anyone honestly say nuclear
power is any form of real alternative that gives a positive future for
Australians or for humanity? In "reprocessing" such nuclear waste
into "valuable commodities" such as depleted uranium munitions or
nuclear bombs... I cannot see these things as valuable commodities to our
planet, its people or any of its inhabitants.
Our elected leaders seem to have lost the plot. They are
elected by the people to represent their wishes and ensure their voters best
long term interests are honestly represented, via the use of their taxes.
The exploitation of our country’s natural resources (land,
coal, uranium, gold, forests, water, etc) and existing infrastructures
(schools, hospitals, Telstra) resulted in a “budget surplus” which is given
back – like crumbs off the table come election time in vote grabbing hand outs.
The remainder lines the pockets of our elected
representatives and their private corporation sponsors in “grants” and
“subsidies”. The removal of hard earned working conditions (in WorkChoices) is
yet another bonus to those that control the purse strings and profit off the
sweat of my back. What of the costs of political party advertising and
"public education"? I wish they would get their dirty hands out of
our pockets!
Industrial growth (and ensuing budget surplus) can continue
with Geothermal Energy. Geothermal is a proven and viable alternative to
nuclear power.
For those who do not understand Geothermal energy, I submit the following
summary from:
http://geothermal.marin.org/geoenergy.html
The word geothermal comes from the Greek words geo (earth) and therme (heat),
and means the heat of the earth. In geothermal power plants, we use the natural
hot water and steam from the earth to turn turbine generators to produce
electricity. Unlike fossil fuel power plants, no fuel is burned. Geothermal
power plants give off water vapor, but have no smoky emissions.
Flashed Steam Plants. Hot water from production wells passes through one or two
separators where, released from the pressure of the deep reservoir, part of it
flashes (explosively boils) to steam. The force of the steam is used to spin
the turbine generator. To conserve the water and maintain reservoir pressure,
the geothermal water and condensed steam are directed down an injection well
back into the periphery of the reservoir, to be reheated and recycled.
Dry Steam Plants. A few geothermal reservoirs produce mostly steam and very
little water. Here, the steam shoots directly through a rock-catcher and into
the turbine. The first geothermal power plant was a dry steam plant, built at
Larderello in Tuscany, Italy
in 1904. The power plants at the Larderello dry steam field were destroyed
during World War II, but have since been rebuilt and expanded. That field is
still producing electricity today. The Geysers dry steam reservoir in northern California
has been producing electricity since 1960. It is the largest known dry steam
field in the world and, after 40 years, still produces enough electricity to
supply a city the size of San Francisco.
As of 1999 8,217 megawatts of electricity were being produced from some 250
geothermal power plants running day and night in 22 countries around the world.
These plants provide reliable base-load power for well over 60 million people,
mostly in developing countries.
----------------------------
As you can see, there are clean alternatives to Coal and Nuclear energy.
There is a way forward for humanity, without returning to the dark ages.
The Howard Government's solution to clean energy supplies is no solution at
all. The Rudd Labor Government's solution is not much better.
Where do these parties stand on Geothermal energy supplies for base-load and industrial
purposes?
It is time that our elected representatives started listening to their people,
told the truth and got on with the job of supplying us with what we need.
What frustrates me the most is that solutions for clean
viable energy supplies are available. The building of a clean, sustainable
economy is possible. Big industry can continue and budgets can remain “in
surplus”. No household would ever be left “in the dark”. If only the right
people controlled our taxes.
I have been writing my fingers to the bone for a couple of
years now, but it appears they are too heavily invested in business as usual.
Australians, please think very carefully and use your
precious vote wisely.
Regards
Anne Goddard
|