Subscribe to the YouDecide2007 newsletter






 
Home arrow Media Releases arrow Greens rural health policy the right medicine for the bush
Greens rural health policy the right medicine for the bush

By Shannon Morris,


Greens lead Senate candidate for Queensland, Larissa Waters has launched the Greens rural health policy in Bundaberg today with the Greens candidate for Hinkler, Charles Dickes..

Last week the National Rural Health Alliance gave the Greens top marks for its policies to improve the health of Australians in rural, regional and remote areas, including a national health plan, better health infrastructure for small towns, improved mental health services and investment in oral and dental health.

"The Greens are committed to delivering better health services for Australians living in rural and remote areas, including for Indigenous Australians," said Ms Waters.

"The Howard government has announced $100 billion in tax cuts in the past three years, but it has not found the money for more hospital beds, nurses, doctors or dentists for the millions of Australians who do not live in cities.

"The Greens will scrap the $3.5 billion private health insurance rebate, which has failed to take the pressure off public hospitals, and re-invest that money in public health and hospitals.The Greens would also pool Federal, State and Local health care resources into a National Health Fund administered by a National Health Reform Commission.

"Our policy focuses on increasing the number of well funded multipurpose community health care centres and services in regional, rural, and remote Australia.

"Ensuring that such centres provide GPs and nurses, dentists, immunisation, midwifery, physiotheraphy, occupational therapy and counselling would improve the current health inequities that exist for Australians living in rural areas.

The Greens health care strategy essentially will take the burden of care off over-stretched and under-resourced hospitals and implement community-based options."The Greens focus on preventive healthcare saves lives and money.


“The Government must shoulder some of the blame on critical health shortfalls because it seriously restricted medical and nursing student places in 1996, soon after being elected.

“We need to put some serious money into recruiting GPs to regional and rural areas. Properly funding general practice will take the pressure off our overcrowded public hospitals and will save money in the long run.

“We need an urgent increase in rural medical and nursing student places and we need financial incentives to recruit health professionals.

"While Labor and the Coalition promise tax cuts, The Greens want to see an investment in our public health care system so it can provide top quality care for all Australians regardless of where they live or their capacity to pay.

"Australia's fortunes have never been greater, yet rural health care has never been in a more dire need of funding," concluded Ms Waters.  The NRHA election scorecard can be found at www.ruralhealth.org.au


   

Users' Comments  RSS feed comment

Display 5 of 7 comments

sounds interesting

By: Spider (Registered ) on 11-11-2007 03:09

That sounds interesting but have the Greens revealed how they are going to fund such a grand scheme?

» Report this comment to administrator

 

funding...

By: anne_elk (Registered ) on 11-11-2007 03:38

I'm not a spokesperson for the Greens, so asking them directly would be the way to go : 
During past elections, funding would have come from OUR TAXES, which (still) go into the hands of private insurance companies, private hospitals, private child care centers, and private aged care facilities. 
 
Yes, we pay taxes, those taxes which should be spent directly on OUR health system. But currently those taxes do not. They go into the coffers of private companies' We then have to pay again if we want to be able to take advantage of "decent" health care - via "private health insurance".  
The Government then "subsidises" these payments (with our taxes). 
- and even then we pay the "excess". 
 
The current system of health "taxation" stinks! 
 
The Greens policies fix the system so that our taxes go directly BACK into OUR health industry, as they should. 
 
Millions of our dollars are being diverted, ask the Greens for exact figures.

» Report this comment to administrator

 

woops....

By: anne_elk (Registered ) on 11-11-2007 03:41

Hi again Spider,  
 
Sorry didn't paste the address for any further questions you may have. 
 
greens@greens.org.au 
 
Cheers :-)

» Report this comment to administrator

 

Finding the money...???

By: anne_elk (Registered ) on 13-11-2007 06:59

Hi to anyone who has followed this tread. 
I shot off an email to the Greens asking Spider's question for him... 
Here is their reply: 
 
"Hi Anne, 
 
The funding of our health initiatives will come from the $3.5 billion dollars which does not go to the private health insurance rebate scheme 
(i.e. this is cost neutral - we do not need to find any more money). This money will instead be allocated to the public health system. I thought this was pretty clear in the policy. Perhaps you can convey this to the forum. 
I am too busy to join it. 
 
Regards, 
 
Peter Johnson 
Administrative Support 
National Office 
Australian Greens 
admin@greens.org.au 
 
So in summary... Our current Government hands over  
a whopping $3.5 BILLION dollars of OUR tax dollars to private health. How's that for private health corporations "double dipping" into our pockets (and our health system)! 
 
Cheers all 
Anne

» Report this comment to administrator

 

be careful with your figures

By: Murray for Oxley (Registered ) on 13-11-2007 09:57

While you may disagree with how to fund health, some of the money that goes into private health insurance actually pays to make sick people better. That $3.5bn is not simply a handout to the health insurance industry. 
 
Similarly, the idea of governments subsidising private companies is not new, nor is it foreign to the Greens, who advocate subsidising R&D into alternate energy sources amongst other things.  
 
I'm not saying that providing funding for those is a bad thing, but subsidies themselves are not bad and only a purely capitalist system (that doesn't exist anywhere) would have no government involvement in business at all - something neither me (nor do I suspect the Greens) support.

» Report this comment to administrator

 

Display 5 of 7 comments



Add your comment
Only registered users can comment an article. Please login or register.

More comments...



mXcomment 1.0.2 © 2007-2008 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
 
< Prev   Next >